In the end, this would further prove the views of Parmenides and Zeno, that movement is impossible, since if there is an infinite number of atoms between point 1 and 2, then you could never traverse them, because you could infinitely bisect the number of atoms that separate 1 from 2. Something can’t come from nothing. Managed by Chittam Technology Solutions, LLC. Can Something Come from Nothing? [ ↩] Lear: "Nothing can come of nothing: speak again." These atoms could come in different shapes and sizes and were the foundation of all existence. Virtual particles are often cited as evidence that things can come into existence from nothing, since they pop into existence out of the quantum vacuum. Every day beautiful and miraculous objects suddenly appear, from snowflakes on a cold winter morning to vibrant rainbows after a late-afternoon summer shower. The last issue that we must then discuss in regards to both YEC’s and Atheists/Agnostics (insert label here) is the issue of turning the Philosophical Nothing into Something. ((“Something Good” from The Sound of Music (1965). It’s a catch-22. It is impossible to get from one point to another, because the distance can be infinitely divided in half, meaning any distance between two points is infinite. 1. Well, that's not really accurate. “Something can’t come from nothing, so their must be a God” (cosmological, or First Cause, argument) is not only a non sequitur when defending ones religious claims, it is also not a very good argument on its own merit. If virtual particles can come from nothing, does that mean that something can actually come from nothing? It is the be all and end all of existence. And if you wish to show that something may in fact come from this nothing, you can simply indicate that if there is nothing, then there is nothing to prevent something from coming into existence, and if you want to talk about the idea of nothing being nonsensical (even though it still is logically possible) you can simply turn to the ancient works of old, where they showed that proposing nothing within the scope of things which exist becomes entirely problematic, and then you can go from there. Can something come from nothing? When this question is asked it is usually in regard to the origin of our universe. Only God can create something from Nothing in their minds. I actually have a theory about this that, as far as I can tell, explains the actual creation of all existence from absolute ubiquitous nothingness. And to go from that next halfway point to the destination you must again go half way. Lawrence M. Krauss is a renowned cosmologist and professor of the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University_._ He is the author of numerous articles and books, including the best-selling _The Physics of Star Trek_ and _A Universe from Nothing_ that includes an Afterword from atheist provocateur Richard Dawkins_._ Krauss is an outspoken atheist, evolutionist, and anti-Christian. He must steal that energy from the theistic power plant that he ridicules, misrepresents, and claims it doesn’t exist. Can Something Come From Nothing? Depends on how you define "nothing". Evolutionists must believe in “miracles” and “magic.” An evolutionist like Krauss can’t explain how the world works except to descend into irrationality. Atomists (like Democritus) believed that motion was possible. Then we could go back in time (because we’re super smart and can do that) and create the universe. Morse, Wilbur and Orville Wright, Werner von Braun, Raymond Damadian (inventor of the MRI), and many other scientists would be surprised to know this since modern scientists stand on the shoulders of these Christian scientists. Whether or not they actually do appear from nothing, it’s disputed whether virtual particles are actually real. There is no "nothing" in space and never was. Where did that first cell come from? Report Post . How does a materialist like Krauss account for non-physical entities like mathematics and physics in a cosmos that seemingly came into existence out of nothing and continues to operate in terms of fixed and predictable laws? – Erin’s Conclusion. Together with various other more technical properties, this led Tryon to suggest that the universe was created from nothing or, more precisely, what physicists call the vacuum state. He needs energy to make his evolutionary machine work. He goes on to claim that “every day beautiful and miraculous objects suddenly appear.” Krauss mentions “miracles,” and Richard Dawkins, who wrote the Afterword to Krauss’ book and heaps abundant praise upon it, describes evolution as “magic” in his own book The Magic of Reality: How We Know What’s Really True. If it were, it would cease to be nothing and become something. Otherwise its an endless conundrum of what came first, the chicken or the egg. You want to let go of your past and start on a new journey, but there is nothing for you to start off with. If 'something' can come from nothing, then you would have to accept the fact that there are actually 2 states of nothing, one that supports the creation of 'something' and another that doesn't. The universe came from nothing. Does this mean that love, compassion, morality, and a whole host of human emotions are nothing but mathematics? The books goes through the big bang and many other cosmological aspects that will enrich your understanding of the known universe. Ok, where did God come from? These particles have tremendous density but we cannot observe them, for their observable characteristics cancel each other out. The beauty of Tryon’s suggestion is that the properties of this vacuum state can be calculated, so the question of how “nothing” became “something” was opened up. Something is something and nothing is nothing and to think otherwise is nonsense! Results are only viewable after voting. ((Lawrence M. Krauss, A Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather Than Nothing (New York: Free Press, 2012), xiii.)). Old King Lear has decided to retire and divide his kingdom among his three daughters. BUT I like to point out, IF nothing comes from nothing where did God get the material he needed to create things? What if mankind developed for a million years and became so smart that we would essentially be Gods. Something can't come out of nothing. 0. With science, a cell divides from another cell. But the physicists argue that it follows naturally from science's two most powerful and successful theories: quantum mechanics and general relativity. A vacuum might seem like empty space, but scientists have discovered a new way to seemingly get something from that nothingness, such as light. Can Something Come From Nothing? I am sorry to say that the Eleatic School has the far more convincing argument in this context. Q: “How can something come from nothing?” …Let’s see! Any answer that solves this problem for god can probably also just be used to explain the universe itself instead. Logic, real logic, alone cannot tell us whether something can come from nothing or not, just like it couldn't tell us if the orbits of the planets are perfect spheres or if the sun orbits the earth. No, only God, and my God at that. Dr. Krauss is engaged in some evolutionary sleight of hand. Ask them where did the first matter come from? Nothing comes from nothing, Nothing ever could. But is that the only possibility? There simply never has been nothing. Therefore between all atoms are atoms, and between those atoms are atoms and this goes on infinitely. The fact that we exist and are made of matter is indisputable; the question of why our Universe contains something (matter) instead of nothing … … Anyway, recently i have started to believe in a creator again as i have found no other explanation for our existence? Or to put it more colloquially: in order to get from one point to another, first you must go halfway. After all, they ask, “How can something come from nothing?” One such religious notion is the story of creation: once upon a time there was nothing, and then, miraculously, there was something. What makes them laws? And if you wish to show that something may in fact come from this nothing, you can simply indicate that if there is nothing, then there is nothing to prevent something from coming into existence, and if you want to talk about the idea of nothing being nonsensical (even though it still is logically possible) you can simply turn to the ancient works of old, where they showed that proposing nothing within the scope of things which exist becomes entirely problematic, and then you can … If you can't get something from nothing, then why do you think you can go on to argue the next step? To most people, the claim that something cannot come from nothing is a truism. "In Stephen Hawking’s new book The Grand Design, he says that because of the law of gravity, the universe can and will create itself out of nothing. "Something cannot come from nothing" implies that we know what "nothing" is, but we apparently do not. If nothing comes from nothing then even God had to have something to start with! It is another way of saying there are no laws and nothing upon which actions could even take place. Well nothing, because nothing cannot stop anything because it is… nothing. An idea can come from nothing. The something from nothing hypothesis is illogical, unscientific, and faith-based. The following is his starting point upon which he builds his worldview: [M]ost of the energy in the universe resides in some mysterious, now inexplicable form permeating all of empty space. A = Atom(s) used with numbers to differentiate, P2) If B = N then NE is between A1 and A2, P3) If NE is between A1 and A2 then A1 and A2 cannot be separated as there is no E to separate them. Well, before you click away, we only have one half of this issue at hand, as we have yet to consider Democritus’ side of this story (and then we will see how they conflict). On the centenary of James Clerk Maxwell’s birth, Albert Einstein described Maxwell’s work as the “‘most profound and the most fruitful that physics has experienced since the time of Newton.’ Einstein, when he visited the University of Cambridge in 1922, was told by his host that he had done great things because he stood on Newton’s shoulders; Einstein replied: ‘No I don’t. P1) If A1 and A2 are separated by B then B = E (see above converse issue if false), P2) If B = E then B =/= N therefore B =/= NE, P3) If B =/= NE, and N = NE then N cannot be between A1 and A2, P4) Therefore between all A there must be E. In English, a similar issue to the problem of Bisection will occur, wherein between every atom is another atom, since all things that exist are made of atoms, and in order for atoms to be separated there must be something that exists which separates them (otherwise they couldn’t be separate). I was an atheist for about two years and have read the God delusion and i used to be a Catholic. In other words, the total amount of energy in the universe appears to be zero. … Where did all the stuff in the universe come from and how is it still a law if it was once broken? The beauty of Tryon’s suggestion is that the properties of this vacuum state can be calculated, so the question of how “nothing” became … Man created the gods to ease their insecurity with their ignorance of … And if we can say that the universe can come from nothing, then we have solved one of the oldest philosophical problems there is. In the end, the curse that Zeno and Parmenides plagued us with remains: motion is impossible, because between any two points there are an infinite number of atoms (thank goodness for Limitations and Calculus). The first version of this article, which I wrote all the way back in 1997, merely compiled a list of quotes from physicists affirming that something can indeed come from nothing through entirely natural processes, and that the entire universe might be one such thing. I don’t know of a single “fundamentalist” who has ever claimed that God designs every snowflake. "Nothing" is not a type alternate reality. The following is from the Preface to his book: In the interests of full disclosure right at the outset I must admit that I am not sympathetic to the conviction that creation requires a creator, which is at the basis of all the world’s religions. But the question came up: What is between these atoms? Lyrics by Richard Rodgers. First, there is the issue that they must prove that something cannot come from nothing. When put in a modern context, like discussing the Big Bang and “Something coming from nothing,” YEC’s will have numerous issues trying to use this concept. One of the most fundamental questions of all time nicely dealt with by the guys on the Atheist Experience. Posted by: mjswift. However, if they are touching, then there is no space between them and therefore no space for this void/nothing, therefore there is no void. In conclusion, something could come from nothing but equally not become at all. Now this is where things get more interesting. These guys have come up with the first rigorous proof that the Big Bang could indeed have occurred spontaneously because of quantum fluctuations. Well it is nothing at all, because everything that has existence is made of atoms, so the void is something non-existent. When scientists say that the universe can simply come out of nothing without any divine intervention, they think of the universe in terms of its energy content only. Like Reply Challenge. We now have two competing schools of thought, those following the Eleatic School and those Atomists who don’t at all agree. It can’t account for anything since anything is something and something does not appear spontaneously from nothing. What is there to stop something from popping into existence? have gone so far to say that the cosmos—including us—“is nothing but mathematics.” ((Max Tegmark, “The Great Math Mystery,” NOVA.)) From the scientific definition, something MUST come from nothing based on quantum theory. From the Philosophical definition, no, but "nothing" can't be shown to ever have existed, so it's a moot point. Now at this point, if you are not mathematically minded or familiar with things like Limitations then you are right now rocking back and forth in your chair questioning existence (maybe I’m projecting my own experience after dealing with this). C) Therefore A1 and A2 are together and there is no B, therefore no N. Something came from nothing due to god leads directly into the question Where did god come from. In the book ‘The Grand Design’, page 281, scientist Stephen Hawking has written that bodies like stars or black holes cannot just appear out of nothing, but a whole universe can. First, that’s a great Sci-Fi book concept, and I thought of it. It’s not an understatement to say that the discovery has changed the playing field of modern cosmology. The science is complicated, and so is the theory. While the question seemed all-important and pertinent to the ancients, what we now know about the nature of the universe renders it obsolete. The issue as you can see is that, in the end, the concept of nothing seems to be self-defeating in these contexts. Something came from nothing due to god leads directly into the question Where did god come from. So there you go, I saved the less mentally damaging for last. You want to see a scientist, who doesn't believe in the existence of God, unravel and come unglued in front of your eyes??? Clearly not everything touches everything else, so what is it that is between these atoms? For example, if we were to put existence and nonexistence in complementary sets, linguistically we treat them as both existing. So now we have established that something can come from nothing. Dec 2, 2011 #21. BUT I like to point out, IF nothing comes from nothing where did God get the material he needed to create things? Here is this common misconception in a nutshell: “The universe couldn’t have possibly popped into existence out of nothing.” Quantum Physics is, in a way, the new kid on the block. Pushkin October 19, 2002, 12:36pm #1. Nothing can come of nothing. The conclusion is that if God needed a cause, then God is not God (and if God is not God, then of course there is no God). In fact, the word "nothing" can be broken apart to show that it means "no-thing." Can Something Come From Nothing? Believe it or not there are some atheists who actually think nothing can do something. It seems that religious people are trying to hijack a “reasoning” or “scientific” method of approaching the argument, and it just doesn’t work. While the question seemed all-important and pertinent to the ancients, what we now know about the nature of the universe renders it obsolete. The foundational points we can establish thus far are the following: 1. Given the First Law of Thermodynamics: that you can't get something from nothing. And if some things can appear out of nothing then why can't the universe or God for that matter had come from nothing? You can't have division without a cell. Creatio ex nihilo (Latin for "creation out of nothing") refers to the belief that matter is not eternal but had to be created by some divine creative act, frequently defined as God. where nothing can be added or subtracted from the 'specimen'. ((Ian Hutchinson, “James Clerk Maxwell and the Christian Proposition”: http://silas.psfc.mit.edu/Maxwell/)). This is where all parties can fall into a fallacy, because we have to distinguish that just because we treat something as an object within language, that doesn’t make it a real object (unicorns aren’t real, even though when discussing them, we talk about them in terms of real things).

Paralyze Enchantment Skyrim, Paralyze Enchantment Skyrim, Toro Electric Leaf Blower Switch, Audio System Malaysia, 2 Ft T5 Fluorescent Light Fixtures, Fitbit Aria 3 Rumours, Portable Sink Depot,